Vans vs Reebok Shoe Size — Which Runs Smaller?
Vans runs about half a US size small compared to Reebok. If you wear Vans in US 9, start by checking Reebok in US 8.5. Both brands use the same foot-length measurement — the difference is in the last shape, not the conversion formula.
Save this comparison profile
Save your usual Vans size, then reuse it across brand comparisons without retyping.
Local-only by default. Share links include foot length, width and note in the URL, so use them only with people you trust.
Switching rule for this pair
At the US 9 anchor, the same 262mm foot maps to Reebok US 8.5. In plain terms: when moving from Vans to Reebok, go down half a US size.
- Vans: runs small signal from 60% of buyer-fit data.
- Reebok: true to size signal from 60% of buyer-fit data.
- If you know your foot length in millimetres, use the Size Passport above before trusting a label-to-label switch.
Vans → Reebok size chart
| US Men (Vans) | Vans → Reebok | Foot length |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | 6.5 | 246mm |
| 8 | 7.5 | 254mm |
| 9 | 8.5 | 262mm |
| 10 | 9.5 | 271mm |
| 11 | 10.5 | 279mm |
Fit verdict
- Vans: Runs small (60% of buyers)
- Reebok: True to size (60% of buyers)
Why the sizes differ
Vans runs ~0.5 size smaller than Reebok.
Vans foot length is measured in millimetres, then mapped to US size. The Reebok last fits the same foot, but the starting label shifts by about half a US size because of each brand's fit bias — not a different conversion formula.